The fact is that a form of gay marriage has been legal in Denmark since full marriage rights except for adoption rights and church weddings, and a proposal now exists in the Danish parliament to allow both of those rights as welland most of the rest of Scandinavia from not long after. So the response has been to place ballot constitutional amendment initiatives on the ballot in the states that allow for that. One sees the slippery-slope fallacy in almost every one of their arguments, because they have few logically sound arguments to which to resort. Louis, Missouri 5 November St. May Learn how and when to remove this template message. Jiccelebraw il-vot favur il-ligi taz-zwieg indaqs fi Piazza Kastilja".
Archived from the original on 25 October
National Organization for Marriage
Because it hasn't happened in any significant way. For example, 8 of the 10 states with the highest median income have legalized same-sex "marriage" Maryland, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Hawaii, Delaware, and California. How to approach discussions with them? In JulyKim Jho Kwang-soo and his partner, Kim Seung-Hwan, filed a lawsuit seeking legal status for their marriage after their marriage registration form was rejected by the local authorities in Seoul. Again, the Court ruled that it must.
Retrieved 6 October Hodgescouples in same-sex marriages could only obtain a divorce in jurisdictions that recognized same-sex marriages, with some exceptions. As for gay marriage itself undermining western civilization, it is hard to see how the promotion of love, commitment, sharing and commonality of values and goals isn't going to strengthen civilization a lot sooner than it is going to undermine it. Archived from the original on 16 February Opposition to the Danish law was led by the clergy much the same as in the States. About half of people in the U. James Dobson cites Stanley Kurtz to argue that the motivation of those advocating same-sex "marriage" is not to secure the benefits of marriage for homosexual couples, but to destroy the institution of marriage itself:.